BANGKOK, Sept. 7 — The authorities in Myanmar, apparently bowing to bad publicity, released a political prisoner today whose leg was broken when he was arrested in the recent outbreak of antigovernment protests. His case had gained international attention when fellow prisoners staged a hunger strike calling for his freedom.
On Thursday, a delegation of military officers was briefly held hostage by Buddhist monks at a temple outside the main city of Yangon. The officers had reportedly gone there to apologize to the monks for treating them roughly during a demonstration the day before.
These are not the kind of conciliatory gestures Myanmar’s iron-fisted military junta is known for. But it has been put on the defensive by an unusual campaign of public protests over the past three weeks, just as it is trying to portray itself to the world as a mature, democratically-oriented military government.
The junta has just completed 14 years of fitful work on an outline of what it calls a democratic constitution, and it is facing a possible onslaught of criticism from the United States at the United Nations Security Council this month.
Despite its efforts at conciliation, there were reports of continuing opposition activity today.
Leaders of the opposition party, the National League for Democracy, were reported to be meeting in Myanmar’s second city, Mandalay. Angry monks were reported to have destroyed two buildings owned by officials involved in Wednesday’s crackdown in Pakokku, a center of Buddhist learning about 400 miles northwest of Yangon.
The New Light of Myanmar, a state-controlled newspaper, reported its version today of the violence and the hostage-taking, saying the officers handed over their cellphones to the monks after they had “supplicated to them” over the situation.
Its report confirmed witnesses’ accounts that monks had burned several military vehicles on Wednesday and that shots had been fired to disperse the rally.
It added: “The government has got information that external antigovernment groups are giving directives and providing various sorts of assistance to internal antigovernment groups to stir up mass demonstrations and instability.”
Though the protests have mostly been small, scattered and quickly suppressed, they have been publicized by an international network of well-established prodemocracy groups with ties to the dissidents inside Myanmar.
That publicity has now caught the attention of more widely known names like Laura Bush and a lineup of Hollywood celebrities who have spoken out in support of the prodemocracy movement and particularly its symbolic leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, who is being held under house arrest.
“She represents to me, really, the hopes of everyone in Burma, of all the Burmese, who long for a day of democracy there, a day without an oppressive regime,” Mrs. Bush said, using the country’s former name.
President Bush also mentioned the protests in a speech at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum in Sydney, Australia. “We must press the regime in Burma to stop arresting, harassing and assaulting prodemocracy activists for organizing or participating in peaceful demonstrations,” he said, according to Reuters.
Myanmar’s crackdown also drew expressions of dismay from other Asia-Pacific nations. China, Myanmar’s closest ally, which is usually reticent when it comes to the affairs of others, also sounded frustrated with its neighbor. “We hope to see reconciliation and improvement in the situation in Burma,” a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman told Reuters.
The demonstrations began Aug. 19, triggered by an abrupt rise in the price of fuel that caused a steep increase in the costs of transportation and basic goods in what is already one of the poorest countries in Asia.
They coincided with the conclusion of a Constitutional Convention on Sept. 3 that the junta calls the first step on its “road map to democracy.” That process, which the generals say will conclude with a democratic election, is the junta’s frequent response to criticism of its record in human rights and political repression.
Washington has not confirmed whether it will try for the second year to introduce a Security Council resolution condemning abuses by the junta. Last year China and Russia vetoed an American move to include Myanmar on the council’s agenda.
The United States has led escalating international economic sanctions against Myanmar, prodded by prodemocracy groups and by a wave of municipal boycotts a decade ago.
The fuel price rise offered an opportunity to the junta’s opponents to remind the world of Myanmar’s record, said John Dale, a sociologist at George Mason University who has studied what he calls the “transnational networks and symbolic politics” of Myanmar’s prodemocracy movement.
“They wanted to rain on this party and didn’t want them to come away looking like they were really making any steps toward democracy,” he said.
The junta has handled the protests carefully since they began last month, using military-backed civilian gangs rather than uniformed officers to break up demonstrations and make arrests.
A number of arrested protesters have been released and have reported that they were treated well.
This contrasts with the military massacres that took thousands of lives during a major prodemocracy uprising in 1988.
“One interpretation is that the state doesn’t want to take on these protests through its usual means, through violence and an indiscriminate crackdown, knowing that they have a broader international audience,” Mr. Dale said.
The other interpretation is that the government is biding its time, as it did in 1988, before coming down very hard on protesters.
In the current protests, there had been no reports of gunfire until Wednesday’s military attack on the monks. Buddhist clergy members have been at the center of major protests in the past, and any spread of unrest among them would be a worry to the junta.
It was not clear whether the new reports of violence at the monastery were an isolated eruption or were the beginning of a new round of unrest.
The Democratic Voice of Burma, a prodemocracy organization based in Norway with contacts inside the country, said “a few monks” visited the home last night of a leader of the crackdown “to have a talk with him and teach him some Buddhist manners.”
“But he wasn’t at home,” it reported, “so they destroyed a few things from his house to teach him a lesson instead.”
Labels: English, News, The New York Times